Hi Andy, On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Minkyu Kang <proms...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Raffaele Recalcati, > > On 3 April 2011 13:39, Raffaele Recalcati <lamiapost...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Minkyu, >> >> I have sent some patches about mmc and reviewed one, can you please >> tell me what to do mainline them? >> >> 11 mar : >> [PATCH 1/3][v3] mmc: checking status after commands with R1b response >> --> it has one Tested-by >> >> [RFC 2/3][v3] mmc: SEND_OP_COND considers card capabilities (voltage) >> --> it has one Tested-by >> [PATCH 3/3][v3] mmc: trace added --> useful for getting information >> >> 23 mar : >> [U-Boot] [PATCH] MMC may wrongly regconize 2GB eMMC as high capacity >> --> I have reviewed and proposed a different, I think better and simpler, >> way. >> There is a curious dependency between capacity and high_capacity variables. >> > > I'm not a maintainer of mmc. > Please ask to Andy Fleming. > > Andy, > could you please check Raffaele's patches? > > Thanks > Minkyu Kang. > -- > from. prom. > www.promsoft.net >
can you please take a look at these patches ? Regards, Raffaele _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
