On February 2, 2024 thus sayeth Andrew Davis: > On 1/31/24 9:06 PM, Bryan Brattlof wrote: > > Currently, for the K3 generation of SoCs, there are more SoCs that > > utilize the split firmware approach than the combined DMSC firmware. > > Invert the logic to avoid adding more and more SoCs to this list. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bryan Brattlof <b...@ti.com> > > --- > > arch/arm/mach-k3/Kconfig | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-k3/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-k3/Kconfig > > index 03898424c9546..0574e81075e6d 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-k3/Kconfig > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-k3/Kconfig > > @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ config K3_ATF_LOAD_ADDR > > config K3_DM_FW > > bool "Separate DM firmware image" > > - depends on CPU_V7R && (SOC_K3_J721E || SOC_K3_J721S2 || SOC_K3_AM625 || > > SOC_K3_AM62A7) && !CLK_TI_SCI && !TI_SCI_POWER_DOMAIN > > + depends on CPU_V7R && ARCH_K3 && !SOC_K3_AM642 && !SOC_K3_AM654 && > > !CLK_TI_SCI && !TI_SCI_POWER_DOMAIN > > Always amusing to see how many SoCs get added to these lists before someone > realizes there is only one or two SoCs that are not on the list :)
Haha having to resize my terminal is when I had enough :) > > BTW, this whole file is inside an "if ARCH_K3" block, so all symbols > depend on ARCH_K3 automatically. You can drop that check. > Nice catch! I'll drop that in v2 > Otherwise, > > Acked-by: Andrew Davis <a...@ti.com> > > > default y > > help > > Enabling this will indicate that the system has separate DM
