On 2/2/2024 10:31 AM, Ravi Gunasekaran wrote:
> 
> 
> On 1/30/2024 11:48 AM, MD Danish Anwar wrote:
>> Use ring_idx to pair rings. ring_idx will be same as tx flow_id for all
>> non-negative flow_ids. For negative flow_ids, ring_idx will be tchan->id
>> added with bchan_cnt.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: MD Danish Anwar <danishan...@ti.com>
>> ---
>> Changes from v3 to v4:
>> *) No functional change. Splitted the patch out of the series as suggested
>>    by Nishant.
>>
>> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240124064930.1787929-2-danishan...@ti.com/
>>
>>  drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c | 11 +++++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c b/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c
>> index 8a62d63dfe..eea9ec9659 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c
>> @@ -876,13 +876,20 @@ static int udma_alloc_tx_resources(struct udma_chan 
>> *uc)
>>  {
>>      struct k3_nav_ring_cfg ring_cfg;
>>      struct udma_dev *ud = uc->ud;
>> -    int ret;
>> +    struct udma_tchan *tchan;
>> +    int ring_idx, ret;
>>  
>>      ret = udma_get_tchan(uc);
>>      if (ret)
>>              return ret;
>>  
>> -    ret = k3_nav_ringacc_request_rings_pair(ud->ringacc, uc->tchan->id, -1,
>> +    tchan = uc->tchan;
>> +    if (tchan->tflow_id >= 0)
>> +            ring_idx = tchan->tflow_id;
>> +    else
>> +            ring_idx = ud->bchan_cnt + tchan->id;
>> +
>> +    ret = k3_nav_ringacc_request_rings_pair(ud->ringacc, ring_idx, -1,
>>                                              &uc->tchan->t_ring,
>>                                              &uc->tchan->tc_ring);
>>      if (ret) {
> 
> I see this change present in upstream linux kernel as well.
> You could consider providing the link to kernel if such changes are already
> merged there.

Sure Ravi,

Link to upstream kernel code for the same [1].
Upstream Commit: d2abc982333c02f9e1ff1c6b3782174f5b7662d7

[1]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c?h=v6.8-rc2#n1686

> 
> Reviewed-by: Ravi Gunasekaran <r-gunaseka...@ti.com>

-- 
Thanks and Regards,
Md Danish Anwar

Reply via email to