On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 04:34:41PM +0200, Svyatoslav wrote: > > > 25 січня 2024 р. 16:17:34 GMT+02:00, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> > написав(-ла): > >On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 04:16:11PM +0200, Svyatoslav wrote: > >> > >> > >> 25 січня 2024 р. 16:12:36 GMT+02:00, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> > >> написав(-ла): > >> >On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 08:51:09AM +0200, Svyatoslav wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> 25 січня 2024 р. 08:29:54 GMT+02:00, Dan Carpenter > >> >> <dan.carpen...@linaro.org> написав(-ла): > >> >> >On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 10:27:30PM +0200, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote: > >> >> >> Currently, if boot with extlinux.conf and do not set the fdt > >> >> >> U-Boot will provide its own device tree. This behavior is > >> >> >> beneficial if the U-Boot device tree is in sync with Linux, > >> >> >> but it totally halts the booting of pre-dtb kernels (3.4 for > >> >> >> example) since it uses ATAGs. To fix this, pass `-` in the > >> >> >> fdt extlinux field as a signal that no tree should be used. > >> >> > > >> >> >Passing - doesn't seem like the most intuitive thing... Is there a > >> >> >different argument we could use? > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> I agree that `-` is not the most intuitive argument, > >> >> but this is a way to implement a fix with the least > >> >> code posssible. To make this less obscure I have > >> >> adjusted documentation. > >> > > >> >It's also how historically we do similar things. eg, "bootm > >> >$kernel_addr_r - $fdt_addr_r". My question is can we re-work this, > >> >cleanly, with guards around SUPPORT_PASSING_ATAGS to not increase size > >> >anywhere that doesn't need this legacy case. > >> > > >> > >> Which behavior you propose? > > > >Well, using the IS_ENABLED macro with the new tests around "-". > > > > So using "-" for booting with extlinux with ATAGs is fine for you? > Guards, sure, I will handle this. Which tests you are interested in? > Maybe you can point to an example? Thanks.
Sorry, I meant tests in terms of writing the code, not unit tests as no, we don't have enough unit tests around booting a kernel as it stands and I don't see how to just add a test for extlinux + legacy kernel. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature