On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 00:51:48 +0200 Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> wrote:
> Dear Kim Phillips, > > In message <20110401173209.55577aea.kim.phill...@freescale.com> you wrote: > > On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 09:16:15 +0200 > > Heiko Schocher <h...@denx.de> wrote: > > > > > - use I/O accessors > > > -> For accessing the FPGA therefore a struct km_bec_fpga > > > is introduced. > > > - no longer externs needed > > > - to defines, that only select functions, don;t assign a > > > numeric value > > > - Codingstyle changes to prevent checkpatch errors/warnings > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <h...@denx.de> > > > cc: Kim Phillips <kim.phill...@freescale.com> > > > cc: Holger Brunck <holger.bru...@keymile.com> > > > cc: Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> > > > cc: Detlev Zundel <d...@denx.de> > > > cc: Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longch...@keymile.com> > > > cc: Prafulla Wadaskar <prafu...@marvell.com> > > > --- > > > > Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phill...@freescale.com> > > Why do you send a "Signed-off-by" here? > > Did you mean "Acked-by:" ? > > Signed-off-by "certifies that you wrote it or otherwise have the right > to pass it on as a open-source patch." However, you have not been > anywhere in the queue of creating or forwarding these patches? as 83xx maintainer, I sign off on all patches committed to the mpc83xx tree, which are subsequently 'forwarded' to the main u-boot tree. This particular case is no different, except the 83xx patches here are too intertwined with other, non-83xx ones. So to facilitate the process, I sign them off on-list such that they can be applied as-is to the main u-boot tree. hth, Kim _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
