On 20/01/24 22:11, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 01:42:51PM +0530, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
>> Hello Tom,
>>
>> On 12/01/24 18:56, Tom Rini wrote:

...

>>> The list of conditionals in common/spl/spl.c::board_init_r() should be
>>> updated and probably use SPL_NET as the option to check for.
>>
>> Thank you for reviewing the patch and pointing this out. I wasn't aware of 
>> it. I
>> assume that you are referring to the following change:
>>
>>         if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPL_OS_BOOT) || CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(HANDOFF) ||
>> -           IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPL_ATF))
>> +           IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPL_ATF) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPL_NET))
>>                 dram_init_banksize();
>>
>> I shall replace the current patch with the above change in the v2 series. 
>> Since
>> this is in the common section, is there a generic reason I could provide in 
>> the
>> commit message rather than the existing commit message which seems to be 
>> board
>> specific? Also, I hope that the above change will not cause regressions for
>> other non-TI devices. Please let me know.
> 
> Yes, that's the area, and just note that networking also requires the
> DDR to be initialized.
> 

Thank you for confirming and providing your suggestion for the contents of the
commit message.

-- 
Regards,
Siddharth.

Reply via email to