On 02.01.24 18:42, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 08:27:34AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 27.12.23 13:39, Nishanth Menon wrote: >>> On 15:00-20231221, Tom Rini wrote: >>>> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 11:43:46AM -0600, Bryan Brattlof wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello Everyone! >>>>> >>>>> This series gets the am65x booting again along with syncing the device >>>>> tree files with v6.7-rc1 Linux. >>>>> >>>>> The bulk of these patches unify the WKUP SPL board file with the arm64 >>>>> files to make future syncs from Linux much easier. In the end the DTBs >>>>> should look a lot like what the DTBs look like for the am64x which >>>>> is fairly similar to the am65x. >>>>> >>>>> For those interested in what UART boot looks like: >>>>> https://paste.sr.ht/~bryanb/7df8a645dc548912cd806abd5ecab967ef3287bc >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for reviewing and happy holidays >>>>> ~Bryan >>>> >>>> For the series, >>>> Tested-by: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> >>>> >>>> Nishanth, does this path work for you? >>>> >>> >>> Other than the minor comments provided in the relevant patches, >>> >>> The following files also need sync up with v6.7-rc1. >>> >>> k3-am65-iot2050-common-pg2.dtsi >>> k3-am65-iot2050-common.dtsi >>> k3-am6528-iot2050-basic-common.dtsi >>> k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced-common.dtsi >>> k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced-m2.dts >>> >>> Jan - could you look at syncing those once an update to this series is >>> posted? We could probably have a smoother v6.8-rc1 from then on. >>> >> >> We currently plan to sync once support for the new SM variant is in the >> upstream DT. Do you see other changes that would benefit from an earlier >> sync? > > So this sync is because the ref platforms at least do not boot, is > iot2050 currently booting?
It was booting with ~v2024.01-rc4 before Christmas, didn't try latest master yet. Jan -- Siemens AG, Technology Linux Expert Center
