On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 05:45:24PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote: > > > On 12/20/23 16:46, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 05:28:43PM +0530, Love Kumar wrote: > > > > > Add below test cases for i2c commands: > > > i2c_bus - To show i2c bus info, > > > i2c_dev - To set or show the current bus, > > > i2c_probe - To probe the i2c device, > > > i2c_eeprom - To test i2c eeprom device, > > > i2c_probe_all_buses - To list down all the buses and probes it > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Love Kumar <love.ku...@amd.com> > > > Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> > > > --- > > > Changes in v2: > > > - Take the configured eeprom value from env to read back and compare > > > --- > > > test/py/tests/test_i2c.py | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 108 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 test/py/tests/test_i2c.py > > > > So this leads to failures in CI on other platforms. Please put this and > > the other tests through CI: > > https://docs.u-boot.org/en/latest/develop/ci_testing.html > > Can you give me link to that gitlab build to see it? > I can push it via my tree but it will be just resource wasting to see errors > which you have seen already.
The first failure is https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/jobs/758375#L268 but I suspect that like the mii or mdio (I forget which now) test, they end up needing to be opt-in, but should also have their comments expanded to make sure it's clear what expected values to configure the test are. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature