Hi Neil, On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 at 02:54, <neil.armstr...@linaro.org> wrote: > > On 17/12/2023 19:41, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 11:46:18AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > >> Hi Tom, > >> > >> On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 at 06:11, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > >>> [..]
> > And my point with the above is that other SoC maintainers (Neil, for > > amlogic) have said (paraphrasing) he does not want to do N smbios node > > patches. Which is why Ilias' patch is if not 1000% correct, it's Good > > Enough and will, if it's really a problem to have all lower case > > information displayed, spur people to see providing that information as > > a real problem that needs to be solved. Or it will be seen as good > > enough. > > > > If some platforms requires a more "correct" smbios dataset, then they're > welcome adding the required smbios node, and it's perfectly understandable, > but for the other community-maintained platforms we need some valid fallback > data otherwise they'll be de facto excluded from some tools for no valid > reasons. Do you know which tools require SMBIOS tables? I found sos and another Redhat one. Regards, Simon
