On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 11:45:36AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 at 10:12, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 08:14:26PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Create a common function used by the three existing bootz/i/m_run()
> > > functions, to reduce duplicated code.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
> > > Suggested-by: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Changes in v3:
> > > - Add new boot_run() function
> > >
> > > boot/bootm.c | 40 ++++++++++++++--------------------------
> > > include/bootm.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/boot/bootm.c b/boot/bootm.c
> > > index 53236136f489..6a4cebcf7a08 100644
> > > --- a/boot/bootm.c
> > > +++ b/boot/bootm.c
> > > @@ -1123,47 +1123,35 @@ err:
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -int bootm_run(struct bootm_info *bmi)
> > > +int boot_run(struct bootm_info *bmi, const char *cmd, int extra_states)
> > > {
> > > int states;
> > >
> > > - bmi->cmd_name = "bootm";
> > > - states = BOOTM_STATE_START | BOOTM_STATE_FINDOS |
> > > BOOTM_STATE_PRE_LOAD |
> > > - BOOTM_STATE_FINDOTHER | BOOTM_STATE_LOADOS |
> > > - BOOTM_STATE_OS_PREP | BOOTM_STATE_OS_FAKE_GO |
> > > - BOOTM_STATE_OS_GO | BOOTM_STATE_MEASURE;
> > > + bmi->cmd_name = cmd;
> > > + states = BOOTM_STATE_MEASURE | BOOTM_STATE_OS_PREP |
> > > + BOOTM_STATE_OS_FAKE_GO | BOOTM_STATE_OS_GO;
> > > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SYS_BOOT_RAMDISK_HIGH))
> > > states |= BOOTM_STATE_RAMDISK;
> > > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MIPS))
> > > - states |= BOOTM_STATE_OS_CMDLINE;
> > > + states |= extra_states;
> > >
> > > return bootm_run_states(bmi, states);
> > > }
> > >
> > > -int bootz_run(struct bootm_info *bmi)
> > > +int bootm_run(struct bootm_info *bmi)
> > > {
> > > - int states;
> > > -
> > > - bmi->cmd_name = "bootz";
> > > - states = BOOTM_STATE_MEASURE | BOOTM_STATE_OS_PREP |
> > > - BOOTM_STATE_OS_FAKE_GO | BOOTM_STATE_OS_GO;
> > > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SYS_BOOT_RAMDISK_HIGH))
> > > - states |= BOOTM_STATE_RAMDISK;
> > > + return boot_run(bmi, "bootm", BOOTM_STATE_START |
> > > BOOTM_STATE_FINDOS |
> > > + BOOTM_STATE_PRE_LOAD | BOOTM_STATE_FINDOTHER |
> > > + BOOTM_STATE_LOADOS);
> > > +}
> > >
> > > - return bootm_run_states(bmi, states);
> > > +int bootz_run(struct bootm_info *bmi)
> > > +{
> > > + return boot_run(bmi, "bootz", 0);
> > > }
> > >
> > > int booti_run(struct bootm_info *bmi)
> > > {
> > > - int states;
> > > -
> > > - bmi->cmd_name = "booti";
> > > - states = BOOTM_STATE_MEASURE | BOOTM_STATE_OS_PREP |
> > > - BOOTM_STATE_OS_FAKE_GO | BOOTM_STATE_OS_GO;
> > > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SYS_BOOT_RAMDISK_HIGH))
> > > - states |= BOOTM_STATE_RAMDISK;
> > > -
> > > - return bootm_run_states(bmi, states);
> > > + return boot_run(bmi, "booti", 0);
> > > }
> > >
> > > int bootm_boot_start(ulong addr, const char *cmdline)
> > > diff --git a/include/bootm.h b/include/bootm.h
> > > index eba35b33b4e5..9e0f8d60de0a 100644
> > > --- a/include/bootm.h
> > > +++ b/include/bootm.h
> > > @@ -150,6 +150,24 @@ int bootm_measure(struct bootm_headers *images);
> > > */
> > > int bootm_run_states(struct bootm_info *bmi, int states);
> > >
> > > +/**
> > > + * boot_run() - Run the entire bootm/booti/bootz process
> > > + *
> > > + * This runs through the boot process from start to finish, with a base
> > > set of
> > > + * states, along with the extra ones supplied.
> > > + *
> > > + * This uses bootm_run_states().
> > > + *
> > > + * Note that it is normally easier to use bootm_run(), etc. since they
> > > handle
> > > + * the extra states correctly.
> > > + *
> > > + * @bmi: bootm information
> > > + * @cmd: command being run, NULL if none
> > > + * @extra_states: Mask of extra states to use for the boot
> > > + * Return: 0 if ok, something else on error
> > > + */
> > > +int boot_run(struct bootm_info *bmi, const char *cmd, int extra_states);
> > > +
> > > /**
> > > * bootm_run() - Run the entire bootm process
> > > *
> >
> > Overall good, thanks. My question is, should we mark the others as
> > static, or is this new helper static and not to be called externally?
>
> The others are used externally.
>
> For bootm_run() I toyed with the idea of it being static, but then
> wondered if we might use that programmatically instead of the
> bootz/i/m(_run) versions. It is quite nice that the differences are
> now pretty minor between them.
>
> I don't mind either way, though.OK, lets put it on the TODO list for once the CMDLINE=n case is fully flushed out and code otherwise cleaned up and organized, it'll perhaps be clearer then if the answer is old functions, new function or neither function. Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
