On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 01:10:45PM +0100, Csókás Bence wrote: > > > 2023. 12. 14. 18:53 keltezéssel, Tom Rini írta: > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 05:29:31PM +0100, Csókás Bence wrote: > > > > > It may be necessary to set breakpoints etc. on a specific fault handler > > > in SPL. > > > Add a Kconfig option to separate the different handlers into their own > > > individual infinite loops. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Csókás Bence <csokas.be...@prolan.hu> > > > --- > > > arch/arm/Kconfig | 10 ++++++++++ > > > arch/arm/lib/vectors.S | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > > > 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig > > > index 328e2ddc33..47494cb72b 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig > > > +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig > > > @@ -79,6 +79,16 @@ config SPL_SYS_NO_VECTOR_TABLE > > > depends on SPL > > > bool > > > +config SPL_USE_SEPARATE_FAULT_HANDLERS > > > + bool "Use separate fault handlers instead of a single common one" > > > + depends on !SPL_SYS_NO_VECTOR_TABLE > > > > Will this dep catch that this is only valid for !ARM64 && !CPU_V7M ? > > Is it? How so? > So should I put `depends on !SPL_SYS_NO_VECTOR_TABLE && !ARM64 && !CPU_V7M` > instead?
Well, looking at arch/arm/lib/Makefile, vector.S is only used in the case I said, so you would need to modify the other files as well. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
