Hi Caleb, On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at 13:21, Caleb Connolly <caleb.conno...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > On 21/11/2023 19:08, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 05:09:32PM +0000, Caleb Connolly wrote: > > > >> Revive support for booting db410c using the Linux kernel header, this > >> allows for testing the board more easily via `fastboot`. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Caleb Connolly <caleb.conno...@linaro.org> > >> --- > >> board/qualcomm/dragonboard410c/MAINTAINERS | 1 + > >> configs/dragonboard410c_chainloaded_defconfig | 75 > >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+) > > > > How different is this from the regular defconfig, and assuming this is > > also a partial answer to my question about "why not select?", why is > > this not just a config fragment instead of a whole new defconfig to keep > > in sync? > > Oh, I was totally unaware of the concept of board config fragments in > U-Boot. That's definitely a much cleaner solution.
Can you make a single image that handles both? There is ll_boot_init() Regards, Simon
