On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 10:58:50AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: [snip] > I found these: > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=262148&state=* > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20210925121958.26001-1-p...@kernel.org/ > > IMO the second one from Pali makes sense, but it was never followed > up. It doesn't look too difficult. > > We should have a policy that if people complain about a patch but > don't follow up, we apply the patch we have.
I think the patch from Pali was the right direction, but as I noted, I wanted to see it implemented for some other UARTs as well, and it wasn't high on anyone elses priority list. Covering ns16550-style UARTs too would be good. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
