On 10/28/23 07:35, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Michal,

On Wed, 6 Sept 2023 at 12:22, Michal Simek <mon...@monstr.eu> wrote:

Hi Simon,

Ășt 25. 7. 2023 v 23:36 odesĂ­latel Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> napsal:

In moving from v0.8 to v0.9 the Firmware Handoff specification made some
changes, including:

    - Use a packed format for headers to reduce space
    - Add an explicit alignment field in the header
    - Renumber all the tags and reduce their size to 24 bits
    - Drop use of the blob header to specify alignment, in favour of a
      'void' blob type

This series attempts to align to that specification, including updating
the API and tests. It is likely that refinements will be made as other
projects implement the spec too.

As before the code is dual-licensed, to permit use in projects with a
permissive license.


Simon Glass (14):
   bloblist: Update the tag numbering
   bloblist: Adjust API to align in powers of 2
   bloblist: Change the magic value
   bloblist: Set version to 1
   bloblist: Access record hdr_size and tag via a function
   bloblist: Drop the flags value
   bloblist: Drop the spare values
   bloblist: Change the checksum algorithm
   bloblist: Checksum the entire bloblist
   bloblist: Handle alignment with a void entry
   bloblist: Reduce blob-header size
   bloblist: Reduce bloblist header size
   bloblist: Add alignment to bloblist_new()
   bloblist: Update documentation and header comment

  arch/x86/lib/tables.c    |   3 +-
  common/bloblist.c        | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
  doc/develop/bloblist.rst |   4 +-
  include/bloblist.h       | 121 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
  test/bloblist.c          |  53 +++++++++--------
  5 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 131 deletions(-)

--
2.41.0.487.g6d72f3e995-goog


Would it be also possible to align names in the bloblist_hdr structure?
magic->signature
align_log2->alignment
alloced->size
size->max_size

The same is for bloblist_rec.

OK. I am not sure I like the size/max_size thing so I filed an issue for that.

Fine for me. At the end they should match with spec. Update in spec is fine.


I don't know the history but spec is about transfer list and transfer entry.
Do you plan to rename it to avoid confusion?

I don't really like transfer_list_xxx as an API. It is too
long-winded. We used that name since it is unique and descriptive as
to its purpose. But I think that 'bloblist' is a better name in the
code base. Perhaps we could use xferlist instead of bloblist?

xferlist sounds good to me.

M

Reply via email to