On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 09:58:53AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
>
> Am 26. Oktober 2023 07:30:50 MESZ schrieb AKASHI Takahiro
> <takahiro.aka...@linaro.org>:
> >Now it is clear that the feature actually depends on efi interfaces,
> >not "bootefi" command. efi_set_bootdev() will automatically be nullified
> >if necessary efi component is disabled.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.aka...@linaro.org>
> >---
> > fs/fs.c | 7 +++----
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/fs/fs.c b/fs/fs.c
> >index 4cb4310c9cc2..70cdb594c4c8 100644
> >--- a/fs/fs.c
> >+++ b/fs/fs.c
> >@@ -791,10 +791,9 @@ int do_load(struct cmd_tbl *cmdtp, int flag, int argc,
> >char *const argv[],
> > return 1;
> > }
> >
> >- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CMD_BOOTEFI))
> >- efi_set_bootdev(argv[1], (argc > 2) ? argv[2] : "",
> >- (argc > 4) ? argv[4] : "", map_sysmem(addr, 0),
> >- len_read);
> >+ efi_set_bootdev(argv[1], (argc > 2) ? argv[2] : "",
>
> This function should not exist for CONFIG_EFI_LOADER=n. There are other
> places where the function is invoked. Please, review all of them.
Please go through the whole patch set, especially patch#8
"efi_loader: split unrelated code from efi_bootmgr.c".
efi_[set|clear]_bootdev() will be nullified if not necessary.
-Takahiro Akashi
> Best regards
>
> Heinrich
>
>
> >+ (argc > 4) ? argv[4] : "", map_sysmem(addr, 0),
> >+ len_read);
> >
> > printf("%llu bytes read in %lu ms", len_read, time);
> > if (time > 0) {
