Hi Heiko and Simon,
Thought I'd follow-up to keep this discussion going. The main thing I
would like to decide first (as it lets me start relying on it in boot
scripts) would be the UBI access syntax:
=> ls ubi 0:rootfs /boot
=> ls ubi 0:2 /boot
Do those look good? Should I be trying to mimic the accepted syntax of
fs/ubifs/super.c:open_ubi()? Perhaps "ubi 0!rootfs" and/or "ubi 0_2"?
Not using ':' leaves open the possibility for logical volumes (LVM2/UBI)
to contain partitions - not that I expect anyone will want that. :)
Cheers,
Sam
