Hi Neha, On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 10:26, Neha Malcom Francis <n-fran...@ti.com> wrote: > > Hi Bhupesh, Marek > > On 16/08/23 02:16, Marek Vasut wrote: > > On 8/15/23 19:48, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > >> On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 at 04:01, Marek Vasut <marek.va...@mailbox.org> wrote: > >>> > >>> On 8/14/23 23:54, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > >>>> Since Faiz Abbas's email ID is no longer valid, > >>>> drop him from UFS Maintainer list. > >>>> > >>>> Since I am using the UFS framework now extensively > >>>> on Qualcomm Snapdragon SoCs, so proposing myself as > >>>> the new UFS maintainer. > >>>> > >>>> I have also been sending out u-boot UFS fixes in the > >>>> recent past. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sha...@linaro.org> > >>> > >>> I believe TI is working on something here, so please coordinate with them. > >> > >> Ok, well I haven't seen any reply to my earlier UFS fix related emails > >> from TI, so I thought maybe no one is actively looking into this area. > >> But I would love to hear from TI on the same.. > > > > This is why I CCed Vignesh and Nishanth , coordinate with them. > > > >> Anyways since I will be working on the Qualcomm UFS glue layer going > >> forward, I can propose to either be a UFS maintainer or a reviewer for > >> now to make sure that the subsystem patches are reviewed and tested . > > > > > > I'd like to propose myself as a UFS maintainer along with Bhupesh, can help > with > reviewing and testing starting with these patches. If all seems okay, I can > send > a MAINTAINERS patch adding both Bhupesh and me.
Thanks for stepping in. The above proposal looks good to me - I can help to-maintain this u-boot framework and work closely with you for testing / reviewing patches related to this area. Many thanks to Nishanth as well for his prompt response when I ping'ed him regarding this :) Thanks, Bhupesh
