On 8/15/23 23:08, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 at 02:31, Marek Vasut <marek.va...@mailbox.org> wrote:
On 8/15/23 22:04, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
Hi Marek,
On 8/14/23 5:22 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Add UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_64BIT_ADDRESS for host controllers which do not
support 64-bit addressing.
Ported from Linux kernel commit
6554400d6f66 ("scsi: ufs: core: Add UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_64BIT_ADDRESS")
with ufs_scsi_buffer_aligned() based on U-Boot generic bounce buffer.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+rene...@mailbox.org>
---
Cc: Faiz Abbas <faiz_ab...@ti.com>
---
drivers/ufs/ufs.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/ufs/ufs.h | 6 ++++++
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/ufs/ufs.c b/drivers/ufs/ufs.c
index 3bf1a95e7f2..da0550d98c6 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/ufs.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/ufs.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
* Copyright (C) 2019 Texas Instruments Incorporated -
http://www.ti.com
*/
+#include <bouncebuf.h>
#include <charset.h>
#include <common.h>
#include <dm.h>
@@ -1889,6 +1890,8 @@ int ufshcd_probe(struct udevice *ufs_dev, struct
ufs_hba_ops *hba_ops)
/* Read capabilties registers */
hba->capabilities = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_CONTROLLER_CAPABILITIES);
+ if (hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_64BIT_ADDRESS)
+ hba->capabilities &= ~MASK_64_ADDRESSING_SUPPORT;
/* Get UFS version supported by the controller */
hba->version = ufshcd_get_ufs_version(hba);
@@ -1942,8 +1945,31 @@ int ufs_scsi_bind(struct udevice *ufs_dev,
struct udevice **scsi_devp)
return ret;
}
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BOUNCE_BUFFER)
+static int ufs_scsi_buffer_aligned(struct udevice *scsi_dev, struct
bounce_buffer *state)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT
+ struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_uclass_priv(scsi_dev->parent);
+ uintptr_t ubuf = (uintptr_t)state->user_buffer;
+ size_t len = state->len_aligned;
+
+ /* Check if below 32bit boundary */
+ if ((hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_64BIT_ADDRESS) &&
+ ((ubuf >> 32) || (ubuf + len) >> 32)) {
+ dev_dbg(scsi_dev, "Buffer above 32bit boundary %lx-%lx\n",
+ ubuf, ubuf + len);
+ return 0;
+ }
+#endif
+ return 1;
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_BOUNCE_BUFFER */
+
static struct scsi_ops ufs_ops = {
.exec = ufs_scsi_exec,
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BOUNCE_BUFFER)
+ .buffer_aligned = ufs_scsi_buffer_aligned,
+#endif /* CONFIG_BOUNCE_BUFFER */
};
int ufs_probe_dev(int index)
diff --git a/drivers/ufs/ufs.h b/drivers/ufs/ufs.h
index 8a38832b05f..070db0dce68 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/ufs.h
+++ b/drivers/ufs/ufs.h
@@ -719,6 +719,12 @@ struct ufs_hba {
*/
#define UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_LCC 0x1
+/*
+ * This quirk needs to be enabled if the host controller has
+ * 64-bit addressing supported capability but it doesn't work.
+ */
+#define UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_64BIT_ADDRESS 0x2
+
/* Virtual memory reference */
struct utp_transfer_cmd_desc *ucdl;
struct utp_transfer_req_desc *utrdl;
For this and the follow-up patch, I think implementing or at least
supporting all the quirks currently supported by the Linux UFS driver
makes sense as newer controllers do support these quirks.
I disagree. There is no point in implementing quirks which cannot be
tested or may not even be relevant to U-Boot. Quirks which are needed
should be added one by one.
I assume you agree we should not add all quirks at once ?
But the format you use for adding new quiks in u-boot is still in sync
with Linux version 3.10. Can we atleast use the newer ( 1<< 7) kind of
format for consistency.
Feel free to update quirks to BIT() macro.
We should enumerate the quirks in order instead of starting with BIT(7)
however.
