On 8/13/23 15:36, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Heinrich,
On Sat, 12 Aug 2023 at 23:01, Heinrich Schuchardt
<heinrich.schucha...@canonical.com> wrote:
board_get_usable_ram_top() returns a physical address that is stored in
gd->ram_top. The return type of the function should be phys_addr_t like the
current type of gd->ram_top.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schucha...@canonical.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-imx/imx8m/soc.c | 2 +-
arch/arm/mach-mvebu/arm64-common.c | 2 +-
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/sdram.c | 2 +-
arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/dram_init.c | 2 +-
arch/arm/mach-sunxi/board.c | 2 +-
arch/arm/mach-tegra/board2.c | 2 +-
arch/mips/mach-jz47xx/jz4780/jz4780.c | 2 +-
arch/mips/mach-octeon/dram.c | 2 +-
arch/riscv/cpu/fu540/dram.c | 2 +-
arch/riscv/cpu/fu740/dram.c | 2 +-
arch/riscv/cpu/generic/dram.c | 2 +-
arch/riscv/cpu/jh7110/dram.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/cpu/broadwell/sdram.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/cpu/coreboot/sdram.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/cpu/efi/payload.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/cpu/efi/sdram.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/cpu/ivybridge/sdram.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/cpu/qemu/dram.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/cpu/quark/dram.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/cpu/slimbootloader/sdram.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/cpu/tangier/sdram.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/include/asm/u-boot-x86.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/lib/fsp1/fsp_dram.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/lib/fsp2/fsp_dram.c | 2 +-
board/broadcom/bcmns3/ns3.c | 2 +-
board/imgtec/boston/ddr.c | 2 +-
board/menlo/m53menlo/m53menlo.c | 2 +-
board/raspberrypi/rpi/rpi.c | 2 +-
board/ti/am65x/evm.c | 2 +-
board/ti/j721e/evm.c | 2 +-
board/ti/j721s2/evm.c | 2 +-
board/toradex/verdin-am62/verdin-am62.c | 2 +-
board/xilinx/common/board.c | 2 +-
common/board_f.c | 2 +-
include/init.h | 2 +-
35 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
While you are here, could you please fix the function comment?
[..]
diff --git a/include/init.h b/include/init.h
index 8873081685..b1e1451166 100644
--- a/include/init.h
+++ b/include/init.h
@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ int show_board_info(void);
*
* @param total_size Size of U-Boot (unused?)
It seems confused about the param, and we should have a return value.
The parameter with the monitor length (size of U-Boot code) is not used
anywhere (though it is passed on to functions like
mrc_common_board_get_usable_ram_top() where it isn't used either).
We should try to eliminate the parameter in further patches.
Also should explain what this function is used for.
That explanation exists.
I will put the documentation fix into a separate patch so we can apply
it to 2023.10. I don't know if Tom wants to apply this patch to next or
to 2023.10.
Best regards
Heinrich
*/
-phys_size_t board_get_usable_ram_top(phys_size_t total_size);
+phys_addr_t board_get_usable_ram_top(phys_size_t total_size);
int board_early_init_f(void);
--
2.40.1
Regards,
Simon
