Hi Sughosh,
On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 at 02:57, Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.g...@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> hi Simon,
>
> On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 at 04:22, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Sughosh,
> >
> > On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 at 02:58, Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.g...@linaro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > The EFI capsule authentication logic in u-boot expects the public key
> > > in the form of an EFI Signature List(ESL) to be provided as part of
> > > the platform's dtb. Currently, the embedding of the ESL file into the
> > > dtb needs to be done manually.
> > >
> > > Add a signature node in the u-boot dtsi file and include the public
> > > key through the capsule-key property. This file is per architecture,
> > > and is currently being added for sandbox and arm architectures. It
> > > will have to be added for other architectures which need to enable
> > > capsule authentication support.
> > >
> > > The path to the ESL file is specified through the
> > > CONFIG_EFI_CAPSULE_ESL_FILE symbol.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.g...@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > > Changes since V4:
> > > * Fix multi line comment format.
> > > * Drop additional blank line.
> > > * Remove the check for CONFIG_EFI_HAVE_CAPSULE_SUPPORT from arm's
> > > u-boot.dtsi.
> > > * Wrap the help text in the EFI_CAPSULE_ESL_FILE config at 72 chars.
> > >
>
> <snip>
>
> > > diff --git a/arch/sandbox/dts/u-boot.dtsi b/arch/sandbox/dts/u-boot.dtsi
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000000..60bd004937
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/arch/sandbox/dts/u-boot.dtsi
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> > > +/*
> > > + * Devicetree file with miscellaneous nodes that will be included
> > > + * at build time into the DTB. Currently being used for including
> > > + * capsule related information.
> > > + *
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_EFI_HAVE_CAPSULE_SUPPORT
> > > +/ {
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_EFI_CAPSULE_AUTHENTICATE
> > > + signature {
> > > + capsule-key = /incbin/(CONFIG_EFI_CAPSULE_ESL_FILE);
> > > + };
> > > +#endif
> > > +};
> > > +#endif /* CONFIG_EFI_HAVE_CAPSULE_SUPPORT */
> >
> > You missed my comment there. You should not need the outer #ifdef, but
> > if you do, please combine them into one #if
>
> I did not miss your comment. The reason I have kept both the ifdefs is
> that we need to include stuff which is needed only when
> CONFIG_EFI_CAPSULE_AUTHENTICATE is enabled, and then the rest of the
> stuff is needed only when CONFIG_EFI_HAVE_CAPSULE_SUPPORT is enabled.
> Not having both the ifdefs would result in build failures. In the
> u-boot.dtsi included for the arm arch, I am using a single ifdef,
> since we are including only the signature node in that file.
Well having
/ {
};
is harmless in all cases, I believe. So you should not need the outer one?
Regards,
Simon
[..]
