Hi Macpaul, On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Macpaul Lin <macp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > As you can see, the include of PMU header has been replaced to a correct path. > [U-Boot,2/3] fttmr010: move fttmr010 controller to drivers/timer folder > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/71952/ > > However, I cannot found the part of previous patch [U-Boot,1/3] > You can find that I have replace a correct path to the file > "arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/a320/timer.c" which haven't been applied. > http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg41320.html > > Wolfgang, could you please check if something have been missing in the > last git apply? > It looks like that we have something missed in the current tree while > this patch have been already applied > "http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg41320.html". > > The missing part is the following patch. > diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/a320/timer.c > b/arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/a320/timer.c > index d2e316f..4718ae6 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/a320/timer.c > +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/a320/timer.c > @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ > > #include <common.h> > #include <asm/io.h> > -#include <asm/arch/ftpmu010.h> > +#include "../../../../../drivers/power/ftpmu010.h" > #include <asm/arch/fttmr010.h> > > static ulong timestamp;
If I remember correctly, this patch was not applied because Wolfgang does not like the include "../../../..". > Po-Yu, > Yes, there are also another patches waiting to be review and be applied. > ftpmu010: fix relocation and enhance features > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/77704/ This patch doesn't seem to affect a320. Since I have a patch to fix the current (compilation) problem, I'll send it to RFC. regards, Po-Yu Chuang _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot