Hi Tim,

On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 at 09:59, Tim van der Staaij | Zign
<tim.vandersta...@zigngroup.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> When I was using U-Boot with a dart_6ul board I occasionally had fitimages 
> that U-Boot would attempt to boot just fine, but the kernel wouldn't actually 
> boot. Debugging found that this was correlated with the header length of the 
> fitImage. Then I noticed this remark in doc/usage/environment.rst about 
> fdt_high:
>
> >If this is set to the special value 0xffffffff (32-bit machines) or
> >0xffffffffffffffff (64-bit machines) then the fdt will not be copied at
> >all on boot. For this to work it must reside in writable memory, have
> >sufficient padding on the end of it for u-boot to add the information
> >it needs into it, and the memory must be accessible by the kernel.
> >This usage is strongly discouraged however as it also stops U-Boot
> >from ensuring the device tree starting address is properly aligned
> >and a misaligned tree will cause OS failures.
>
> And indeed, fdt_high is set to 0xffffffff in the include/configs/dart_6ul.h 
> that I was using. Since mkimage only guarantees 32-bit alignment of the 
> device tree blob within the fitimage, and not the 64-bit alignment that Linux 
> requires, this is basically a 50/50 coin flip. Something simple like adding a 
> few characters to the description string in the fitimage header can make or 
> break the alignment.
>
> Personally I fixed this by removing the fdt_high altogether, which makes 
> U-Boot copy the device tree to an appropriate location. I assume this only 
> works in my situation because I only have half a GiB of RAM and therefore do 
> not have any high memory. I can imagine my fix would be problematic for board 
> variants with more RAM, the setting doesn't exist without a reason of course.
>
> It looks like this issue is not limited to my board; the same usage of 
> fdt_high can be found in many other board configs. I'm not going to suggest 
> what the best fix is because I lack detailed knowledge, but I will pitch that 
> perhaps omitting fdt_high by default is at least preferable to a value that 
> is "strongly discouraged" and causes Linux boot failures somewhat arbitrarily.

I wonder if we should adjust mkimage to use -B 8 as the default?

Regards,
Simon

Reply via email to