On Sun, 22 Jan 2023 11:23:51 -0600 Samuel Holland <sam...@sholland.org> wrote:
> ARCH_SUNXI selects BINMAN, so the condition "!BINMAN && ARCH_SUNXI" > is impossible to satisfy. Indeed the generic ARCH_SUNXI entry in arch/arm/Kconfig selects BINMAN, so that looks fine. The same seems to be true for ARCH_ROCKCHIP, btw. Anyway, for that patch: > Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <sam...@sholland.org> Acked-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przyw...@arm.com> Queued for sunxi/master. Cheers, Andre > --- > > Kconfig | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Kconfig b/Kconfig > index a75cce7e28..f810646e8a 100644 > --- a/Kconfig > +++ b/Kconfig > @@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ config BUILD_TARGET > default "u-boot-with-spl.kwb" if ARMADA_32BIT && SPL > default "u-boot-elf.srec" if RCAR_GEN3 > default "u-boot.itb" if !BINMAN && SPL_LOAD_FIT && (ARCH_ROCKCHIP || \ > - ARCH_SUNXI || RISCV || ARCH_ZYNQMP) > + RISCV || ARCH_ZYNQMP) > default "u-boot.kwb" if (ARCH_KIRKWOOD || ARMADA_32BIT) && !SPL > default "u-boot-with-spl.bin" if MPC85xx && !E500MC && !E5500 && !E6500 > && SPL > default "u-boot-with-spl.bin" if ARCH_AT91 && SPL_NAND_SUPPORT
