On 4/23/23 03:51, Kever Yang wrote:
> Hi Johan,
>
> On 2023/4/21 23:34, Johan Jonker wrote:
>>
>> On 4/21/23 05:15, Kever Yang wrote:
>>> Hi Johan,
>>>
>>> I got below error report from CI test, I think it should be relate to
>>> this patch set.
>>>
>>> =================================== FAILURES
>>> ===================================
>>> 1107
>>> <https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-rockchip/-/jobs/615291#L1107>_________________
>>> test_ut[ut_dm_dm_test_fdt_get_addr_ptr_flat] _________________
>>> 1108
>>> <https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-rockchip/-/jobs/615291#L1108>test/py/tests/test_ut.py:346:
>>> in test_ut
>>> 1109
>>> <https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-rockchip/-/jobs/615291#L1109>assert
>>> output.endswith('Failures: 0')
>>> 1110
>>> <https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-rockchip/-/jobs/615291#L1110>E
>>> AssertionError: assert False
>>> 1111
>>> <https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-rockchip/-/jobs/615291#L1111>E
>>> + where False = <built-in method endswith of str object at
>>> 0x7f7089240c10>('Failures: 0')
>>> 1112
>>> <https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-rockchip/-/jobs/615291#L1112>E
>>> + where <built-in method endswith of str object at 0x7f7089240c10> =
>>> 'Test: dm_test_fdt_get_addr_ptr_flat: test-fdt.c (flat
>>> tree)\r\r\ntest/dm/test-fdt.c:627,
>> dm_test_fdt_get_addr_ptr_fla...xpected 0000000000008000, got
>> 0000000010009000\r\r\nTest dm_test_fdt_get_addr_ptr_flat failed 1
>> times\r\r\nFailures: 1'.endswith
>>
>> It turns out that the suggestion by Simon to use map_sysmem() doesn't work
>> with devfdt_get_addr_index_ptr() somehow.
>>
>> To reproduce with this serie:
>> make sandbox_defconfig all
>> ./u-boot -T -c "ut dm fdt*"
>>
>> Test: dm_test_fdt_get_addr_ptr_flat: test-fdt.c (flat tree)
>> test/dm/test-fdt.c:627, dm_test_fdt_get_addr_ptr_flat(): (void *)0x8000 =
>> ptr: Expected 0000000000008000, got 0000000010009000
>> Test fdt* failed 1 times
>>
>> ===
>>
>> Could Simon have a look at the internal map_sysmem() stuff?
>>
>> Will send 1 patch to replace:
>> [PATCH v8 14/24] core: fdtaddr: add devfdt_get_addr_size_index_ptr function
>>
>> for:
>>
>> [PATCH v9] core: fdtaddr: add devfdt_get_addr_size_index_ptr function
>>
>> Could Kever retest with the patch above replacement?
>
> The CI test pass with this replacement.
I've sent a new separate patch that handles map_sysmem.
[PATCH v9] core: fdtaddr: use map_sysmem() as cast for the return
https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/4990a11d-638f-661d-a7c0-e0c5bf7ff...@gmail.com/T/#u
Apply after:
[PATCH v8 00/24] Fixes for Rockchip NFC driver part 1
with replacement:
[PATCH v9] core: fdtaddr: add devfdt_get_addr_size_index_ptr function
Please have a look.
Johan
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Kever
>