Hi Bin, On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 at 19:22, Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 5:36 AM Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I notice that in image.h we have IH_ARCH_RISCV but no mention of > > IH_ARCH_RISCV64. Should we not have two separate image types, as we do > > with ARM and x86? Otherwise, how would a loader know the word size of > > the target machine? > > I think that's because in RISC-V it is always the same bit-width > U-Boot to load the same bit-width kernel. There is no support of > 32-bit U-Boot to load 64-bit kernel and vice versa.
Yes, understood, but in this case we can't be sure that it is possible load a FIT, e.g. if someone makes a mistake. Would it be OK to create a new "riscv64" type? This has come up in the universal payload discussions. Regards, Simon
