Hi Johan, On Sun, 12 Mar 2023 at 06:21, Johan Jonker <jbx6...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 3/11/23 02:37, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Johan, > > > > On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 08:42, Johan Jonker <jbx6...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> The fdt_addr_t and phys_addr_t size have been decoupled. > >> A 32bit CPU can expect 64-bit data from the device tree parser, > > > > > Sorry if you already responded and I missed it. > > > > I don't understand this line. It looks like sizeof(fdt_addr_t) is > > still 4 on 32-bit machines. So what does this actually mean? > > The original response on WHY we need it for partitions: > https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/7256f237-4b7b-f7d7-834f-f7c3fb898...@gmail.com/T/#m81afcb203e2309c05ca97d36c63ef758cf3cef89 > > Below an explanation of the consequences. > Does this text below help?
Yes, I think I was reading it more generally, but here you are just talking about partitions. Regards, Simon
