On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 at 12:04, Henrik Grimler <hen...@grimler.se> wrote:
>
> Otherwise non-ChromeOS samsung devices, like the odroid boards, are
> stuck in a bootloop if CONFIG_CROS_EC is not enabled:
>
> <...>
> MMC: SAMSUNG SDHCI: 2, EXYNOS DWMMC: 0
> Loading Environment from MMC... *** Warning - bad CRC, using default
> environment
>
> cros-ec communications failure -96
>
> Please reset with Power+Refresh
>
> Cannot init cros-ec device
> resetting ...
>
> Issue started after commit e44d7e73fe0d ("dm: core: Switch
> uclass_*_device_err to use uclass_*_device_check").
>
> Signed-off-by: Henrik Grimler <hen...@grimler.se>
> ---
> board/samsung/common/board.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/board/samsung/common/board.c b/board/samsung/common/board.c
> index 16ce5cb89253..78161b807bac 100644
> --- a/board/samsung/common/board.c
> +++ b/board/samsung/common/board.c
> @@ -217,26 +217,27 @@ int checkboard(void)
> #ifdef CONFIG_BOARD_LATE_INIT
> int board_late_init(void)
> {
> - struct udevice *dev;
> - int ret;
> int mmcbootdev = get_boot_mmc_dev();
> char mmcbootdev_str[16];
>
> - ret = uclass_first_device_err(UCLASS_CROS_EC, &dev);
> - if (ret && ret != -ENODEV) {
> - /* Force console on */
> - gd->flags &= ~GD_FLG_SILENT;
> -
> - printf("cros-ec communications failure %d\n", ret);
> - puts("\nPlease reset with Power+Refresh\n\n");
> - panic("Cannot init cros-ec device");
> - return -1;
> - }
> -
> printf("Boot device: MMC(%u)\n", mmcbootdev);
> sprintf(mmcbootdev_str, "%u", mmcbootdev);
> env_set("mmcbootdev", mmcbootdev_str);
>
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CROS_EC)) {
> + struct udevice *dev;
> + int ret = uclass_first_device_err(UCLASS_CROS_EC, &dev);
> + if (ret && ret != -ENODEV) {
> + /* Force console on */
> + gd->flags &= ~GD_FLG_SILENT;
> +
> + printf("cros-ec communications failure %d\n", ret);
> + puts("\nPlease reset with Power+Refresh\n\n");
> + panic("Cannot init cros-ec device");
> + return -1;
> + }
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
> #endif
> --
> 2.30.2
>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
Another option would be to change the check for -ENODEV to also check
for -EEPFNOSUPPORT (missing uclass).
