On 01/22/2011 02:05 AM, seedshope wrote:
> On 01/22/2011 01:52 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> seedshope wrote:
>>
>>> Since SDRAM init function have already change, So the SDRAM
>>> initial function must be change.
>>
>> This description sounds somewhat tautological...
> If I describe as following:
> Since SDRAM init function have already change, Modify SDRAM inital
> function to adapt to it.
>
> How about it?
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: seedshope <bocui...@gmail.com>
>>
>> Your real name is required in the signoff.
> I use the name for my pen name. It is not problem.
>>
>>> ---
>>> board/samsung/smdk6400/smdk6400.c | 10 +++++++++-
>>> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>>> diff --git a/board/samsung/smdk6400/smdk6400.c
>>> b/board/samsung/smdk6400/smdk6400.c
>>> index 35aa40b..1d03b7a 100644
>>> --- a/board/samsung/smdk6400/smdk6400.c
>>> +++ b/board/samsung/smdk6400/smdk6400.c
>>> @@ -78,10 +78,18 @@ int board_init(void)
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -int dram_init(void)
>>> +void dram_init_banksize(void)
>>> {
>>> + DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
>>> +
>>> gd->bd->bi_dram[0].start = PHYS_SDRAM_1;
>>> gd->bd->bi_dram[0].size = PHYS_SDRAM_1_SIZE;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +int dram_init(void)
>>> +{
>>> + gd->ram_size = get_ram_size((long *)CONFIG_SYS_SDRAM_BASE,
>>> + PHYS_SDRAM_1_SIZE);
>>
>> Could you move this last line more to the right?
> Ya, the orig is ok, But I re-do the patch, It is miss. sorry.
Hi Sergei,
I feel this may be you e-mail issue. I open my patch, It is display as
following:
+ gd->ram_size = get_ram_size((long *)CONFIG_SYS_SDRAM_BASE,
+ PHYS_SDRAM_1_SIZE);
Thanks,
seedshope
>
> Thanks
> seedshope
>>
>> WBR, Sergei
>
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
