On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 01:20:52PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Heinrich, > > On Sun, 29 Jan 2023 at 15:37, Heinrich Schuchardt > <heinrich.schucha...@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 1/28/23 23:01, Simon Glass wrote: > > > Hi Heinrich, > > > > > > On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 at 02:17, Heinrich Schuchardt > > > <heinrich.schucha...@canonical.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> On 1/26/23 00:49, Simon Glass wrote: > > >>> Hi Heinrich, > > >>> > > >>> On Wed, 25 Jan 2023 at 12:00, Heinrich Schuchardt > > >>> <heinrich.schucha...@canonical.com> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> This section does not match the standards of our documentation. > > >>>> > > >>>> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schucha...@canonical.com> > > >>>> --- > > >>>> README | 74 > > >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------- > > >>>> 1 file changed, 74 deletions(-) > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> It seems fairly accurate to me, and includes some good advice. > > >>> > > >>> Regards, > > >>> Simon > > >> > > >> * That section tries to look funny. U-Boot is serious stuff. > > > > > > Some people do have a sense of humour...but in any case it might be > > > better to reword it to meet your standards, rather than delete it? > > > > > >> * The information is outdated. BDI3000 is not on sale, > > >> https://www.denx.de/wiki/bin/view/DULG/Manual is no longer maintained. > > >> * It contains advice that we would prefer not to give like > > >> email("Hi, I am new to U-Boot, how do I get started?") > > >> * It is incomplete. You cannot introduce a new board without defconfig. > > >> > > >> An introduction chapter for new developers in doc/develop/ would be > > >> helpful. > > > > > > OK, so how about updating it, then? Having nothing at all seems bad to me. > > > > As Tom wrote README should be minimal and point to the HTML > > documentation. So nothing to update here. Are you able to provide a > > chapter on porting boards? > > I was hoping you might, since you are wanting to remove what is there, > which I think is better than nothing.
Having re-read the section that was removed, I agree with Heinrich here. What was written 20 years ago, and still correct was too vague to be useful. Someone, anyone, writing something to put under doc/develop/ would be appreciated all the same. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
