On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 07:16:26PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Monday 30 January 2023 11:29:27 Tom Rini wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 05:19:01PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > > From: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > > > Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 07:40:49 -0700 > > > > > > > > This is implicitly used in the source and seems useful, so add it. > > > > > > Not sure how this ended up with an "iommu" tag, but that seems wrong. > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > > > --- > > > > > > > > drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/Kconfig | 4 ++++ > > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/Kconfig > > > > b/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/Kconfig > > > > index 7c51d138c8b..0b2be88e3a1 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/Kconfig > > > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/Kconfig > > > > @@ -7,6 +7,10 @@ config PINCTRL_ARMADA_38X > > > > Support pin multiplexing and pin configuration control on > > > > Marvell's Armada-38x SoC. > > > > > > > > +config SPL_PINCTRL_ARMADA_38X > > > > + def_bool n # Armada 38x pin control driver (SPL) > > > > + depends on SPL && ARMADA_38X && SPL_PINCTRL_FULL > > > > + > > > > config PINCTRL_ARMADA_37XX > > > > depends on ARMADA_3700 && PINCTRL_FULL > > > > bool "Armada 37xx pin control driver" > > > > Looking at the code in question, it's because in > > drivers/gpio/mvebu_gpio.c we conditionally not set request / rfree > > dm_gpio_ops because turris_omnia (only platform in question) does not > > set pinctrl in SPL, but does set SPL_DM_GPIO. So the question I have, is > > all of that intentional and used today, in SPL, on the platform? I guess > > some set/get directions / values, to check board revs or something? > > I think this is because no A38x board use DM pinctrl framework for > configuring pin muxing. All boards set pin muxing in open coded board > function which directly touch HW registers. DM pinctrl driver for A38x > is relatively new and I think nobody converted any board to use it for > initialization.
I do see that turris_omnia builds the pinctrl driver for full U-Boot today. But, does that mean that at some point in the future it should be converted to use SPL_PINCTRL ? As that would imply that we do not need / want SPL_PINCTRL_ARMADA_38X added (I suspect SPL_PINCTRL_STMFX and SPL_PINCTRL_ROCKCHIP are wrong) as it will be handled like the majority of other platforms in this area. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
