On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 09:56:30AM +0100, Luca Ceresoli wrote: > Hello Tom, Simon, Michal, > > On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 12:36:15 -0700 > Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > > > Hi Tom, > > > > On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 at 09:24, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 09:20:09AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > > > On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 at 09:06, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 08:48:37AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 at 06:41, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 02:07:21PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This option is deprecated and only used by two boards. Enable > > > > > > > > it for just > > > > > > > > those two boards, so others don't accidentally enable it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > > > diff --git a/boot/Kconfig b/boot/Kconfig > > > > > > > > index 55f06761ef8..7ab0dd14211 100644 > > > > > > > > --- a/boot/Kconfig > > > > > > > > +++ b/boot/Kconfig > > > > > > > > @@ -282,12 +282,13 @@ config SPL_FIT_SOURCE > > > > > > > > config USE_SPL_FIT_GENERATOR > > > > > > > > bool "Use a script to generate the .its script" > > > > > > > > depends on SPL_FIT > > > > > > > > - default y if SPL_FIT && ARCH_ZYNQMP > > > > > > > > + help > > > > > > > > + This is deprecated. Please do not use it. Use binman > > > > > > > > instead. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lets remove the text around bool so it can't be enabled, and move > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > select'ing it from the two boards that need it. Michal, Luca, > > > > > > > what's > > > > > > > needed to move your two platforms > > > > > > > (avnet_ultrazedev_cc_v1_0_ultrazedev_som_v1_0 and > > > > > > > xilinx_zynqmp_virt off > > > > > > > of this very legacy option, given that other xilinx platforms have > > > > > > > already migrated to binman ? > > Unfortunately I lost access to that board, and since the vendor does > not appear interested in supporting it I think the best options would > be to either remove the defconfig or to keep legacy support. > > Which one would you prefer?
If the vendor doesn't want to support it, and no one can test it, it should get dropped I think. Michal, do you have anything to add here? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
