On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 11:13:03PM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 2:17 AM Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > > > > Buildman should consider a build as a success (with warnings) if missing > > blobs have been dealt with by binman, even though buildman itself returns > > and error code overall. This is how other warnings are dealt with. > > > > We cannot easily access the 103 exit code, so detect the problem in the > > output. > > > > With this change, missing blobs result in an exit code of 101, although > > they still indicate failure. > > So either this or Tom's change of "buildman: Add --allow-missing flag > to allow missing blobs" has broken rc3 builds for Allwinner boards on > Fedora. Tom's isn't a clean revert and I've not had time to test that > but either way the SCP firmware is optional and it works just fine, > ATM we don't have the SCP firmware available to Fedora builds. > > Maybe that sort of of change to the build is expected but which ever > patch it is, and adding "BINMAN_ALLOW_MISSING=1" changes the error but > doesn't change the overall failure, I wouldn't expect this sort of > breakage so late in the cycle. > > Do either of you know which one does the hard breakage here? I thought > I'd highlight it now because I don't have time over the next two weeks > to fully investigate the regression.
So, is this for 32bit or 64bit? I only have a 64bit allwinner in my lab and it needs (I've been assuming, since I'm also passing in SCP) BL31 as well. And since you're mentioning buildman, I assume Fedora IS using that rather than make to build everything. I'll go and think about this now.. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
