On Tue, 16 Aug 2022 at 09:16, Sean Anderson <sean.ander...@seco.com> wrote: > > Several different firmware users have repetitive code to extract the > firmware data from a FIT. Add some helper functions to reduce the amount > of repetition. fit_conf_get_prop_node (eventually) calls > fdt_check_node_offset_, so we can avoid an explicit if. In general, this > version avoids printing on error because the callers are typically > library functions, and because the FIT code generally has (debug) > prints of its own. One difference in these helpers is that they use > fit_image_get_data_and_size instead of fit_image_get_data, as the former > handles external data correctly. > > Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <sean.ander...@seco.com> > --- > > Changes in v2: > - Document helpers > > boot/image-fit.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/image.h | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 107 insertions(+) >
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
