On Dec 21, 2010, at 2:23 PM, Peter Tyser wrote: > > Ah, OK. If we're removing the LAW entries for PCI1 in law.c below, how > is a LAW being set for PCI1? It looks like PCIe laws are set in > fsl_configure_pcie(), and PCI LAWs are set via set_next_law() in > board-specific code? I'm not seeing the call to set_next_law() in X-ES > board specific code after this change though. > > Best, > Peter
Yep, that was missing, will fix ;) - k _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
