On 12/05/2022 09.33, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > I need the dwc_eth_qos to gain a fix similar to what fec_mxc got in > 89b5bd54c1a4. > > The first patch provides a simplification around the logic for > fetching the phy's address, so there's one less case to worry about. > > The second introduces a little helper (it doesn't essentially add any > extra code since it just returns an extra piece of inforamtion that > eth_phy_get_node() already found). > > And the third hooks it up in the dwc_eth_qos driver.
ping... any chance these could get picked up? 1 and 3 has an R-b from Ramon, and I don't think 2 should be controversial. Rasmus
