On Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 10:53:52PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
>
> On 7/31/22 20:41, Simon Glass wrote:
> > On Sun, 31 Jul 2022 at 03:10, Heinrich Schuchardt
> > <heinrich.schucha...@canonical.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > fs_set_blk_dev() probes all file-systems until it finds one that matches
> > > the volume. We do not expect any console output for non-matching
> > > file-systems.
> > >
> > > Convert error messages in erofs_read_superblock() to debug output.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 830613f8f5bb ("fs/erofs: add erofs filesystem support")
> > > Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schucha...@canonical.com>
> > > ---
> > > fs/erofs/super.c | 6 +++---
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
> >
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/erofs/super.c b/fs/erofs/super.c
> > > index 4cca322b9e..095754dc28 100644
> > > --- a/fs/erofs/super.c
> > > +++ b/fs/erofs/super.c
> > > @@ -65,14 +65,14 @@ int erofs_read_superblock(void)
> > >
> > > ret = erofs_blk_read(data, 0, 1);
> > > if (ret < 0) {
> > > - erofs_err("cannot read erofs superblock: %d", ret);
> > > + erofs_dbg("cannot read erofs superblock: %d", ret);
> > > return -EIO;
> > > }
> > > dsb = (struct erofs_super_block *)(data + EROFS_SUPER_OFFSET);
> > >
> > > ret = -EINVAL;
> > > if (le32_to_cpu(dsb->magic) != EROFS_SUPER_MAGIC_V1) {
> > > - erofs_err("cannot find valid erofs superblock");
> > > + erofs_dbg("cannot find valid erofs superblock");
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> >
> > > @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ int erofs_read_superblock(void)
> > > blkszbits = dsb->blkszbits;
> > > /* 9(512 bytes) + LOG_SECTORS_PER_BLOCK == LOG_BLOCK_SIZE */
> > > if (blkszbits != LOG_BLOCK_SIZE) {
> > > - erofs_err("blksize %u isn't supported on this platform",
> > > + erofs_dbg("blksize %u isn't supported on this platform",
> > > 1 << blkszbits);
> >
> > Does this message appear in normal scanning, or is it a genuine error?
>
> The erofs driver on Linux only supports LOG_BLOCK_SIZE == 12. So if we see
> this message we don't have a valid erofs file system.
>
> @linux-erofs:
>
> The Linux driver requires EROFS_BLKSIZ == PAGE_SIZE == 4096.
> The page size on arm64 can be 4 KiB, 16 KiB, or 64 KiB.
> The page size on amd64 can be 4 KiB, 2 MiB or 4 MiB.
> Requiring EROFS_BLKSIZ == PAGE_SIZE is obviously a restriction that should
> be lifted.
Yeah, EROFS doesn't support EROFS_BLKSIZ != PAGE_SIZE explicitly for now,
please help error out this message. Thanks!
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
>
> Best regards
>
> Heinrich
