On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 01:10:45PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jul 2022 at 01:02, Stephan Gerhold <step...@gerhold.net> wrote:
> > Can you check how hard it would be to reuse the upstream QCS404 DT?
> >
>
> It turned out to be patch [1] on top of this patch-set. Please help me
> to test it on boards you have access to.
>
> [1]
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20220714073337.2298978-1-sumit.g...@linaro.org/
>
Thanks! Do you happen to have time to check the other custom bindings in
SDM845 as well? I see two other differences there in addition to the
pinctrl:
1. "qcom,msm-geni-uart": Linux has an additional "qcom,geni-se-qup"
node around that.
2. The "qcom,pm8998-pwrkey" should be in an additional
"qcom,pm8998-pon" container node and then called
"qcom,pm8941-pwrkey".
Also, in U-Boot the keys are modelled as GPIOs which is a bit
strange (I don't think they can be set to output mode for example).
But it might be fine to keep that in the -u-boot.dtsi part for now.
I would be happy to investigate and test the remaining DB410c-specific
parts (e.g. USB there). Cleaning up the DT differences has been on my
TODO list for quite some time but I never got to it, sadly...
Thanks!
Stephan
