Hi, Macpual On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 11:12 AM, <macp...@andestech.com> wrote:
> > > Is the series of patches (v1 to v5) increamental ? > > Should I apply v1 first, and then v2, v3, till v5 ? > > If so, what is base revision to which v1 patch is applied ? > > Thanks for your help. > > Morgan > > Let me explain for you, the patch version v1 to v5 just tagged for the > revision for the same single "patch". > So you just need to apply the latest patch you have. Please do not take > care about the v1-v4 patches. > The latest patch includes the latest update against to the main trunk > (master) source code. > The patch V5 includes only some arch-depedent header files. Should I apply any previous patches ? If you have furthor questions, please reply on the mailing list. > Hope we can work this out together. > > >> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Macpaul Lin < > macp...@andestech.com> wrote: > > > >> This patch add generic header files support for nds32 > architecture. > >> Cache, ptregs, data type and other definitions are > included. > > >> NDS32 is a new 32-bit RISC architecture invented by > andestech.com. > > >> NDS32 also provide N9, N10, N12 different CPU core families > for soft-core > >> and hard-core SoC design. > > >> Note: > >> Empty headers such as config.h, memory.h, processor.h are > necessary for > >> compiling some device drivers. > >> Otherwise those drivers won't be build. > > Best regards, > Macpaul Lin >
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
