Wolfgang, On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 11:12 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear York Sun, > > In message <1291863340-4354-2-git-send-email-york...@freescale.com> you wrote: > > To temporarily fix buffer issue when running at flash, use bigger buffer > > to push down the stack deeper. > > What does this mean? "temporarily fix" ? Do you have another, > permanent fix in the works
I am not happy with this "fix" either. Kumar changed the code to use deeper buffer as a workaround. This is the only way I can make it work following him. > > > Signed-off-by: York Sun <york...@freescale.com> > > --- > > common/hwconfig.c | 2 +- > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/common/hwconfig.c b/common/hwconfig.c > > index 3c9759f..1b33d95 100644 > > --- a/common/hwconfig.c > > +++ b/common/hwconfig.c > > @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ next: > > const char *cpu_hwconfig __attribute__((weak)); > > const char *board_hwconfig __attribute__((weak)); > > > > -#define HWCONFIG_PRE_RELOC_BUF_SIZE 128 > > +#define HWCONFIG_PRE_RELOC_BUF_SIZE 256 > > Is this really, really necessary? Memory is a scarce resource > pre relocation. Let me work with Kumar on this. York _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
