Le 16/05/2022 à 09:22, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi a écrit :
Hi
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 9:10 AM Marcel Ziswiler
<marcel.ziswi...@toradex.com> wrote:
On Mon, 2022-05-16 at 08:58 +0200, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote:
Hi
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 8:51 AM Francesco Dolcini
<francesco.dolc...@toradex.com> wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 08:00:31PM +0200, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote:
Il ven 13 mag 2022, 19:56 Fabio Estevam<feste...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 2:41 PM Thierry Bultel
<thierry.bul...@linatsea.fr> wrote:
There are error messages complaining about some bad blocks, including
block 0x00000000.
Anyway block 0 is always guarantee by nand manufacturer, so having
that bad look strange
I am aligned with Michael here, if you have a NAND device with block 0
bad there is something really wrong going on.
Can you see the SPL on console?
BTW: The datasheet should anybody still be in doubt [1].
[1]https://www.mxic.com.tw/Lists/Datasheet/Attachments/8460/MX30LF4G28AC,%203V,%204Gb,%20v1.0.pdf
Block 0 is guaranteed to be good
at least 1K P/E cycle (with ECC).
According to the datasheet. Question is if the bootrom using the ddtb
is able to boot any way the SPL. If this happen the patches that are
in review
should help him to boot
Dear Michael, in my configuration, I do no have SPL.
However, if you have pending patches that could help to boot, I would be
glad to test them
Cheers
Thierry
Michael
Cheers
Marcel
--
Re: test
www.linatsea.fr <www.linatsea.fr>
--
www.linatsea.fr
