On 16/04/22, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote:
> The call to xilinx_pm_request requires an array of a larger size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jo...@foundries.io>
> ---
> drivers/soc/soc_xilinx_versal.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/soc_xilinx_versal.c b/drivers/soc/soc_xilinx_versal.c
> index f8bcd9ab40..3d8c25c19b 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/soc_xilinx_versal.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/soc_xilinx_versal.c
> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static const struct soc_ops soc_xilinx_versal_ops = {
> static int soc_xilinx_versal_probe(struct udevice *dev)
> {
> struct soc_xilinx_versal_priv *priv = dev_get_priv(dev);
> - u32 ret_payload[4];
> + u32 ret_payload[PAYLOAD_ARG_CNT];
all good? can this be merged?
> int ret;
>
> priv->family = versal_family;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
