On 2022/2/3 2:42, Tom Rini wrote:
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 02:45:44PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi Marcel,
[Adding Tom and Marek]
On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 2:40 PM Marcel Ziswiler
<marcel.ziswi...@toradex.com> wrote:
The blocker to getting non-dm-spl-usb support for IMX8M appears to be
the base addresses and instead of adding more of them to imx-regs.h we
need to get them from DT via of_platdata which nobody has had time to
dig into yet.
I was also a little hesitant due to not using DM in SPL might no longer be
accepted upstream. What is the
stance on this?
My understanding is that there is no requirement to use DM in SPL.
DM isn't required in SPL, no. Are we running in to some size limit
here? I see SPL_DM being set in a number of imx8m* platforms is why I
ask.
I still see this as maintainence effort. And mix DM & non-DM code in one
driver is pain. Should we split non-DM code out to a new folder, such as
drivers/non-dm/[usb,mmc,...]/
Thanks,
Peng.
