On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 at 22:14, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de> wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 1. Februar 2022 16:42:43 MEZ schrieb Sughosh Ganu
> <sughosh.g...@linaro.org>:
> >hi Masami,
> >
> >On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 at 14:03, Masami Hiramatsu
> ><masami.hirama...@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> The efi_update_capsule() may have to handle the capsule flags as an UEFI
> >> runtime and boottime service, but the capsule-on-disk process doesn't.
> >> Thus, the capsule-on-disk should use the efi_capsule_update_firmware()
> >> directly instead of efi_update_capsule().
> >>
> >> Suggested-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.aka...@linaro.org>
> >> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hirama...@linaro.org>
> >> ---
> >> Changes in v2:
> >> - Fix to pass correct pointer to efi_capsule_update_firmware
> >> - Remove ESRT generation, because this part anyway will be removed
> >> next patch.
> >> ---
> >> lib/efi_loader/efi_capsule.c | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_capsule.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_capsule.c
> >> index 4463ae00fd..1ec7ea29ff 100644
> >> --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_capsule.c
> >> +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_capsule.c
> >> @@ -1118,7 +1118,7 @@ efi_status_t efi_launch_capsules(void)
> >> index = 0;
> >> ret = efi_capsule_read_file(files[i], &capsule);
> >> if (ret == EFI_SUCCESS) {
> >> - ret = EFI_CALL(efi_update_capsule(&capsule, 1, 0));
> >> + ret = efi_capsule_update_firmware(capsule);
> >
> >I believe this is not fixing any issue as such. If so, I would vote
> >for keeping the call to efi_update_capsule.
>
> No, this is just about reducing code size by avoiding the EFI_CALL(). It
> should not change behaviour.
Okay, in that case, I will put a check for the FWU Multi Banks feature
being enabled -- with the feature enabled, the call will be to
efi_update_capsule, and with the feature disabled, the call will be
made to efi_capsule_update_firmware. The compiler should compile out
the code whenever the FWU feature is disabled and that will not impact
the code size.
-sughosh
>
> Best regards
>
> Heinrich
>
> With the FWU Multi Bank
> >feature enabled, the checks for capsule acceptance and revert are
> >being done in this function. The reason I have put this code in the
> >function is that it caters to both scenarios of capsule-on-disk and
> >the runtime functionality. In addition, the FWU bootup checks are also
> >done in this function through a call to fwu_update_checks_pass. So if
> >this is not a fix, which I don't think it is, I would prefer this call
> >to remain.
> >
> >-sughosh
> >
> >> if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
> >> log_err("Applying capsule %ls failed\n",
> >> files[i]);
> >>
