Hi Tom, On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 at 13:03, Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 01:01:17PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 at 17:14, Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > In general, and for Azure specifically, we need to have files created in > > > the output directory and cannot assume a writable source directory. > > > Rework the faked blob support to put the faked binary in to the output > > > directory and then stop the test from deleting the now non-existent > > > file. > > > > > > Cc: Heiko Thiery <[email protected]> > > > Cc: Simon Glass <[email protected]> > > > Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > tools/binman/etype/blob.py | 4 +++- > > > tools/binman/ftest.py | 1 - > > > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > Please see this: > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/[email protected]/ > > Ah, I thought you might have had it fixed but I didn't read well enough. > My only concern is I would like to get Azure passing again ASAP. Should > I just grab that patch by itself then?
Yes, but I just sent v2 rebased to master (two patches). Regards, Simon
