Hi Sugosh, On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:26 AM, Sughosh Ganu <urwithsugh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > hi Ben, > > On Wed Nov 17, 2010 at 11:26:47AM -0500, Ben Gardiner wrote: > > Hi Stefano, > > > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:09 AM, Stefano Babic <sba...@denx.de> wrote: > > > [...] > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-davinci/da8xx_common.h > > > b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-davinci/da8xx_common.h > > > deleted file mode 100644 > > > index 8b564f7..0000000 > > > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-davinci/da8xx_common.h > > > +++ /dev/null > > > @@ -1,33 +0,0 @@ > > > -void irq_init(void); > > > -int da8xx_configure_lpsc_items(const struct lpsc_resource *item, > > > - int n_items); > > > -#if defined(CONFIG_DRIVER_TI_EMAC) && > > > defined(CONFIG_MACH_DAVINCI_DA850_EVM) > > > -void da850_emac_mii_mode_sel(int mode_sel); > > > -#endif > > > > I don't know what is the best way to proceed... I like the current > > state of this patch series. I was unable to apply the three patch > > series (Sugosh's, Yours and mine) in any order without conflicts. > > I think you would need to rebase your patch 'da850: Add RMII > support for EMAC', on top of my patches. I had made changes in the
I agree. A respin is on the way > include/asm/arch-davinci/hardware.h and moved the > board/davinci/da8xxevm/common.h, both of which you are making > changes to. Stefano's patch series should then apply on top of your > rebased patch. Missed out your patch, else would have flagged you in > advance. Sorry about that. No worries. -- Best Regards, Ben Gardiner --- Nanometrics Inc. http://www.nanometrics.ca _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
