On Friday, November 12, 2010 05:55:55 Graeme Russ wrote: > On 10/11/10 14:36, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Saturday, November 06, 2010 18:13:08 Graeme Russ wrote: > >> I saw discussion a little while ago regarding implementing a version of > >> malloc that returns cleared memory - did this gain any traction? > > > > i dont think anyone posted a patch. it would make sense though to > > generalize the zalloc() code since some places are already doing it. > > Actually, I think we should be using calloc() more than we are
if we want to define zalloc() to calloc(), then sure. but forcing people to use calloc() with a size=1 is silly. the API is not nearly as obvious to passing observers as zalloc(). -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
