Simon,
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 08:14:18AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Takahiro,
>
> On Thu, 30 Sept 2021 at 23:04, AKASHI Takahiro
> <takahiro.aka...@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > This member field in udevice will be used to dereference from udevice
> > to efi_object (or efi_handle).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.aka...@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > include/dm/device.h | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> I think this should be generalised.
>
> Can we add a simple API for attaching things to devices? Something like:
Ok.
> config DM_TAG
> bool "Support tags attached to devices"
>
> enum dm_tag_t {
> DM_TAG_EFI = 0,
>
> DM_TAG_COUNT,
> };
>
> ret = dev_tag_set_ptr(dev, DM_TAG_EFI, ptr);
>
> void *ptr = dev_tag_get_ptr(dev, DM_TAG_EFI);
>
> ulong val = dev_tag_get_val(dev, DM_TAG_EFI);
>
> Under the hood I think for now we could have a simple list of tags for
> all of DM:
>
> struct dmtag_node {
> struct list_head sibling;
> struct udevice *dev;
> enum dm_tag_t tag;
> union {
> void *ptr;
> ulong val;
> };
> };
Just let me make sure; Do you intend that we have a *single* list of tags
in the system instead of maintaining a list *per udevice*?
-Takahiro Akashi
> This can be useful in other situations, for example I think we need to
> be able to send an event when a device is probed so that other devices
> (with tags attached) can take action. But in any case, it makes the
> API separate from the data structure, so aids refactoring later.
>
> If we find that this is slow we can change the impl, but I doubt it
> will matter fornow.
>
> >
> > diff --git a/include/dm/device.h b/include/dm/device.h
> > index 0a9718a5b81a..33b09a836f06 100644
> > --- a/include/dm/device.h
> > +++ b/include/dm/device.h
> > @@ -190,6 +190,10 @@ struct udevice {
> > #if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(DM_DMA)
> > ulong dma_offset;
> > #endif
> > +#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(EFI_LOADER)
> > + /* link to efi_object */
> > + void *efi_obj;
> > +#endif
> > };
> >
> > /**
> > --
> > 2.33.0
> >
>
> Regards,
> Simon
