On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 11:29 AM Priyanka Jain (OSS) <priyanka.j...@oss.nxp.com> wrote: > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: U-Boot <u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de> On Behalf Of Z.Q. Hou > >Sent: Friday, September 10, 2021 12:13 PM > >To: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com>; u-boot@lists.denx.de; > >rayagonda.kokata...@broadcom.com > >Cc: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.j...@nxp.com> > >Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] Revert "arm64: Layerscape: Survive LPI one-way reset > >workaround" > > > >+ author of gic_lpi_syscon driver > > > >Hi Rayagonda, > > > >Please add the binding for gic_lpi_syscon driver. > > > >Thanks, > >Zhiqiang > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> > >> Sent: 2021年8月26日 5:05 > >> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de > >> Cc: Z.Q. Hou <zhiqiang....@nxp.com>; Priyanka Jain > >> <priyanka.j...@nxp.com> > >> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Revert "arm64: Layerscape: Survive LPI one-way > >> reset workaround" > >> > >> Ad-hoc bindings that are not part of the upstream device tree / > >> bindings are not allowed in-tree. Only bindings that are in-progress > >> with upstream and then re-synced once agreed upon are. > >> > >> This reverts commit af288cb291da3abef6be0875527729296f7de7a0. > >> > >> Cc: Hou Zhiqiang <zhiqiang....@nxp.com> > >> Cc: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.j...@nxp.com> > >> Reported-by: Michael Walle <mich...@walle.cc> > >> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> > >> --- > >> arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/soc.c | 17 +---------------- > >> arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi | 6 ------ > >> arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1088a.dtsi | 6 ------ > >> arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls2080a.dtsi | 6 ------ > >> arch/arm/dts/fsl-lx2160a.dtsi | 6 ------ > >> 5 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 40 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/soc.c > >> b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/soc.c > >> index 42a096854629..166662a64baf 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/soc.c > >> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/soc.c > >> @@ -43,22 +43,7 @@ DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR; #ifdef > >CONFIG_GIC_V3_ITS > >> int ls_gic_rd_tables_init(void *blob) { > >> - struct fdt_memory lpi_base; > >> - fdt_addr_t addr; > >> - fdt_size_t size; > >> - int offset, ret; > >> - > >> - offset = fdt_path_offset(gd->fdt_blob, "/syscon@0x80000000"); > >> - addr = fdtdec_get_addr_size_auto_noparent(gd->fdt_blob, offset, > >> "reg", > >> - 0, &size, false); > >> - > >> - lpi_base.start = addr; > >> - lpi_base.end = addr + size - 1; > >> - ret = fdtdec_add_reserved_memory(blob, "lpi_rd_table", &lpi_base, > >> NULL, false); > >> - if (ret) { > >> - debug("%s: failed to add reserved memory\n", __func__); > >> - return ret; > >> - } > >> + int ret; > >> > >> ret = gic_lpi_tables_init(); > >> if (ret) > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi > >> b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi index 50f9b527cde1..53b052ed3271 > >> 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi > >> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi > >> @@ -44,12 +44,6 @@ > >> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>; > >> }; > >> > >> - gic_lpi_base: syscon@0x80000000 { > >> - compatible = "gic-lpi-base"; > >> - reg = <0x0 0x80000000 0x0 0x100000>; > >> - max-gic-redistributors = <2>; > >> - }; > >> - > >> timer { > >> compatible = "arm,armv8-timer"; > >> interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(2) | diff --git > >> a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1088a.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1088a.dtsi index > >> 64caa600ad77..3a5a50fb8313 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1088a.dtsi > >> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1088a.dtsi > >> @@ -27,12 +27,6 @@ > >> interrupts = <1 9 0x4>; > >> }; > >> > >> - gic_lpi_base: syscon@0x80000000 { > >> - compatible = "gic-lpi-base"; > >> - reg = <0x0 0x80000000 0x0 0x100000>; > >> - max-gic-redistributors = <8>; > >> - }; > >> - > >> timer { > >> compatible = "arm,armv8-timer"; > >> interrupts = <1 13 0x8>, /* Physical Secure PPI, active-low > >> */ diff > >> --git a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls2080a.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls2080a.dtsi > >> index 7374d580e07e..278daeeb6eea 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls2080a.dtsi > >> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls2080a.dtsi > >> @@ -27,12 +27,6 @@ > >> interrupts = <1 9 0x4>; > >> }; > >> > >> - gic_lpi_base: syscon@0x80000000 { > >> - compatible = "gic-lpi-base"; > >> - reg = <0x0 0x80000000 0x0 0x100000>; > >> - max-gic-redistributors = <8>; > >> - }; > >> - > >> timer { > >> compatible = "arm,armv8-timer"; > >> interrupts = <1 13 0x8>, /* Physical Secure PPI, active-low > >> */ diff > >> --git a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-lx2160a.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-lx2160a.dtsi > >> index > >> a6f0e9bc56be..3b5f0d119e76 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-lx2160a.dtsi > >> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-lx2160a.dtsi > >> @@ -43,12 +43,6 @@ > >> interrupts = <1 9 0x4>; > >> }; > >> > >> - gic_lpi_base: syscon@0x80000000 { > >> - compatible = "gic-lpi-base"; > >> - reg = <0x0 0x80000000 0x0 0x200000>; > >> - max-gic-redistributors = <16>; > >> - }; > >> - > >> timer { > >> compatible = "arm,armv8-timer"; > >> interrupts = <1 13 0x8>, /* Physical Secure PPI, active-low */ > >> -- > >> 2.17.1 > > > Tom, > > I agree that bindings patch is essential for device-tree changes. > But merging this patch will break Layerscape Platforms. > We have requested Rayagonda to submit Binding patch to upstream for review. > > If first patch of binding gets submitted timely, can we defer this patch. > > Regards > Priyanka >
++Bharat, Roman and Henrik.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature