On Monday 01 November 2010, 09:43:57 Reinhard Meyer wrote: > Dear Alexander Stein, > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.st...@systec-electronic.com> > > --- > > > > arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_spi.h | 14 ++++++++++++++ > > 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_spi.h > > b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_spi.h index c520e89..75d4324 > > 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_spi.h > > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_spi.h > > @@ -33,6 +33,20 @@ typedef struct at91_spi { > > > > at91_pdc_t pdc; > > > > } at91_spi_t; > > If we touch header and driver anyway, we could get rid of the depreciated > typedefs, to get conform to the coding style. > > See discussion about that 1-2 days ago :)
Ok, will do a repost after some time. > > +#define AT91_SPI_CR_SPIEN 0x00000001 > > +#define AT91_SPI_CR_SWRST 0x00000080 > > + > > +#define AT91_SPI_MR_MSTR 0x00000001 > > +#define AT91_SPI_MR_MODFDIS 0x00000004 > > +#define AT91_SPI_MR_PCS 0x000f0000 > > + > > +#define AT91_SPI_SR_RXBUFF 0x00000040 > > +#define AT91_SPI_SR_SPIENS 0x00010000 > > + > > +#define AT91_SPI_CSR_NCPHA 0x00000001 > > +#define AT91_SPI_CSR_DLYBS 0x00ff0000 > > +#define AT91_SPI_CSR_DLYBCT 0xff000000 > > + > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY > > After that patch, do we still need LEGACY? I'm unsure about that yet. Anyway I would prefer to remove CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY globally at all occurrences. Best regards, Alexander _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot