Hi Heiko Thiery and Marcel,
On 19/08/2021 16:28, Fabio Estevam wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-evk-u-boot.dtsi
b/arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-evk-u-boot.dtsi
index f200afac9f..75cd59e545 100644
--- a/arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-evk-u-boot.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-evk-u-boot.dtsi
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@
};
- flash {
+ spl {
mkimage {
args = "-n spl/u-boot-spl.cfgout -T imx8mimage -e
0x7e1000";
@@ -217,4 +217,19 @@
};
};
};
+
+ imx-boot {
+ filename = "flash.bin";
+ pad-byte = <0x00>;
+
+ spl: blob-ext@1 {
+ offset = <0x0>;
+ filename = "spl.bin";
+ };
+
+ uboot: blob-ext@2 {
+ offset = <0x57c00>;
+ filename = "u-boot.itb";
+ };
+ };
};
Do we have a consensus on the binman format to generate a monolithic
flash.bin?
I understand that patch 2/2 still needs to be improved, but what about
this one?
Thanks,
Fabio Estevam
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-60 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email:
feste...@denx.de