Hi Heiko Thiery and Marcel,

On 19/08/2021 16:28, Fabio Estevam wrote:

diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-evk-u-boot.dtsi
b/arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-evk-u-boot.dtsi
index f200afac9f..75cd59e545 100644
--- a/arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-evk-u-boot.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-evk-u-boot.dtsi
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@
        };


-       flash {
+       spl {
                mkimage {
                        args = "-n spl/u-boot-spl.cfgout -T imx8mimage -e 
0x7e1000";

@@ -217,4 +217,19 @@
                        };
                };
        };
+
+       imx-boot {
+               filename = "flash.bin";
+               pad-byte = <0x00>;
+
+               spl: blob-ext@1 {
+                       offset = <0x0>;
+                       filename = "spl.bin";
+               };
+
+               uboot: blob-ext@2 {
+                       offset = <0x57c00>;
+                       filename = "u-boot.itb";
+               };
+       };
 };

Do we have a consensus on the binman format to generate a monolithic flash.bin?

I understand that patch 2/2 still needs to be improved, but what about this one?

Thanks,

Fabio Estevam
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-60 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: feste...@denx.de

Reply via email to